Seneca Moral essays
Seneca: The man understands something to have happened:…
The man understands something to have happened: he becomes indignant thereat: he condemns the deed; and he avenges it. All these things cannot be done without his mind agreeing to those matters which touched him.
The passage follows a public-domain translation of Seneca’s moral essays. The reading beside it is ours.
Something happens, and then a whole chain begins: you interpret it as an insult, condemn the person, and decide they deserve payback. Seneca's useful observation is that this chain includes your agreement. The event may arrive uninvited, but the story you build around it is not automatic. A coworker misses your message. They may be careless—or they may be overwhelmed. A driver cuts you off. They may be reckless—or they may be rushing someone to the hospital. You do not have to deny that wrongs occur. You only have to notice that indignation is not the only available judgment. Between the trigger and the retaliation is a small space where you can ask what you actually know. Use that space today. Name the bare fact without adjectives, then list two other explanations. This does not make you naive. It prevents your first interpretation from becoming a sentence.
Related passages
- Marcus Aurelius Four several dispositions or inclinations there be of the mind and understanding, which to be aware of, thou must…
- Diogenes Laertius Heraclitus called self-deceit a dreadful sickness, and even sight a sense that can mislead.
- Marcus Aurelius I answer, That which thou sayest is true indeed, but the true meaning of that which is said, thou dost not understand.…